Review




Structured Review

Servicebio Inc trap stain kit
Trap Stain Kit, supplied by Servicebio Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/trap stain kit/product/Servicebio Inc
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
trap stain kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
86/100 stars

Images



Similar Products

96
TaKaRa trap alp stain kit
Trap Alp Stain Kit, supplied by TaKaRa, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/trap alp stain kit/product/TaKaRa
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
trap alp stain kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Jiancheng Inc trap staining kit
Trap Staining Kit, supplied by Jiancheng Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/trap staining kit/product/Jiancheng Inc
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
trap staining kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Servicebio Inc trap stain kit
Trap Stain Kit, supplied by Servicebio Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/trap stain kit/product/Servicebio Inc
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
trap stain kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Servicebio Inc trap staining kit
SSCs alleviate the radiation-induced bone injury in mice. (A–G) Micro-CT analysis of bone microstructure. (A) Representative micro-CT images of femurs. Quantitative analysis of (B) bone mineral density (BMD), (C) bone volume fraction (BV/TV), (D) trabecular thickness (Tb.Th), (E) trabecular number (Tb.N), (F) connectivity density (Conn.D), and (G) trabecular separation (Tb.Sp) at 2- and 4-weeks post irradiation. (H–K) Histological analysis (Scale bar: 100 μm). (H) <t>H&E</t> <t>staining</t> showing steatosis (arrows) and (I) quantitative analysis of steatotic lesions per field. (J) <t>TRAP</t> staining showing osteoclasts (arrows) and (K) quantitative analysis of osteoclast number per field. (L–O) Immunohistochemical staining of osteogenic markers (Scale bar: 100 μm). (L) Osterix staining and (M) quantitative analysis of Osterix-positive area. (N) β-catenin staining and (O) quantitative analysis of β-catenin-positive area. All experiments were conducted in three groups: Control, irradiation (IR), and IR plus SSC (IR+SSC) at 2- and 4-weeks post-irradiation. All data are presented as mean ± SD, with statistical significance determined by unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test (* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001)
Trap Staining Kit, supplied by Servicebio Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/trap staining kit/product/Servicebio Inc
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
trap staining kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Servicebio Inc tartrate resistant acid phosphatase trap staining kit
SSCs alleviate the radiation-induced bone injury in mice. (A–G) Micro-CT analysis of bone microstructure. (A) Representative micro-CT images of femurs. Quantitative analysis of (B) bone mineral density (BMD), (C) bone volume fraction (BV/TV), (D) trabecular thickness (Tb.Th), (E) trabecular number (Tb.N), (F) connectivity density (Conn.D), and (G) trabecular separation (Tb.Sp) at 2- and 4-weeks post irradiation. (H–K) Histological analysis (Scale bar: 100 μm). (H) <t>H&E</t> <t>staining</t> showing steatosis (arrows) and (I) quantitative analysis of steatotic lesions per field. (J) <t>TRAP</t> staining showing osteoclasts (arrows) and (K) quantitative analysis of osteoclast number per field. (L–O) Immunohistochemical staining of osteogenic markers (Scale bar: 100 μm). (L) Osterix staining and (M) quantitative analysis of Osterix-positive area. (N) β-catenin staining and (O) quantitative analysis of β-catenin-positive area. All experiments were conducted in three groups: Control, irradiation (IR), and IR plus SSC (IR+SSC) at 2- and 4-weeks post-irradiation. All data are presented as mean ± SD, with statistical significance determined by unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test (* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001)
Tartrate Resistant Acid Phosphatase Trap Staining Kit, supplied by Servicebio Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/tartrate resistant acid phosphatase trap staining kit/product/Servicebio Inc
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
tartrate resistant acid phosphatase trap staining kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
TaKaRa tartrate resistant acid phosphatase trap staining kit
Comparative effects of BMP9 and BMP2 on osteogenic differentiation and osteoclastogenesis in vitro. (A) Real‐time PCR analysis of key osteogenic genes (Col1, Runx2, ALP, and OCN) in MC3T3‐E1 cells treated with 8 nM of BMP2 or BMP9 for 3, 5, and 7 days. All gene‐expression levels were normalized to GAPDH. (B) Western blot analysis of osteogenic marker proteins in cell lysates harvested after 7 days of treatment with BMP2 or BMP9. GAPDH was used as the loading control. Densitometric quantification of band intensities (integrated density) normalized to GAPDH is shown below the blots and presented as relative protein expression. (C) Western blot showing dose‐dependent p‐Smad1/5/9 in MC3T3‐E1 cells exposed to varying concentrations of BMP2 or BMP9. Phosphorylation was quantified by densitometry and expressed as fold change vs. control after normalization using [(p‐Smad1/5/9)/(total Smad1/5/9)] and further normalized to GAPDH, as shown in the graph below the blots. Asterisks indicate statistical significance for pairwise comparisons between BMP2 and BMP9 at the same concentration (****, p < 0.0001), unless otherwise indicated. (D) ALP activity and representative images of ALP staining in MC3T3‐E1 cultures after 7 days of induction with BMP2 or BMP9. (E) Alizarin Red S staining illustrating mineralized nodule formation after extended culture with BMP2 or BMP9. (F) Representative <t>TRAP‐stained</t> images of RAW 264.7‐derived osteoclasts following treatment with RANKL (3 nM), BMP2 (8 nM), or BMP9 (8 nM) for 5 days. TRAP‐positive multinucleated osteoclasts are indicated by arrows. Scale bar, 20 μm. (G) Quantification of TRAP‐positive multinucleated cells per well. Data are presented as the mean ± SD ( n = 3 independent experiments), and p ‐values were calculated using one‐way analysis of variance (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001). BMP, bone morphogenetic protein; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; ALP, alkaline <t>phosphatase;</t> Col1, collagen type I; Runx2, runt‐related transcription factor 2; OCN, osteocalcin; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde‐3‐phosphate dehydrogenase.
Tartrate Resistant Acid Phosphatase Trap Staining Kit, supplied by TaKaRa, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/tartrate resistant acid phosphatase trap staining kit/product/TaKaRa
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
tartrate resistant acid phosphatase trap staining kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
TaKaRa trap alp double stain kit
Comparative effects of BMP9 and BMP2 on osteogenic differentiation and osteoclastogenesis in vitro. (A) Real‐time PCR analysis of key osteogenic genes (Col1, Runx2, ALP, and OCN) in MC3T3‐E1 cells treated with 8 nM of BMP2 or BMP9 for 3, 5, and 7 days. All gene‐expression levels were normalized to GAPDH. (B) Western blot analysis of osteogenic marker proteins in cell lysates harvested after 7 days of treatment with BMP2 or BMP9. GAPDH was used as the loading control. Densitometric quantification of band intensities (integrated density) normalized to GAPDH is shown below the blots and presented as relative protein expression. (C) Western blot showing dose‐dependent p‐Smad1/5/9 in MC3T3‐E1 cells exposed to varying concentrations of BMP2 or BMP9. Phosphorylation was quantified by densitometry and expressed as fold change vs. control after normalization using [(p‐Smad1/5/9)/(total Smad1/5/9)] and further normalized to GAPDH, as shown in the graph below the blots. Asterisks indicate statistical significance for pairwise comparisons between BMP2 and BMP9 at the same concentration (****, p < 0.0001), unless otherwise indicated. (D) ALP activity and representative images of ALP staining in MC3T3‐E1 cultures after 7 days of induction with BMP2 or BMP9. (E) Alizarin Red S staining illustrating mineralized nodule formation after extended culture with BMP2 or BMP9. (F) Representative <t>TRAP‐stained</t> images of RAW 264.7‐derived osteoclasts following treatment with RANKL (3 nM), BMP2 (8 nM), or BMP9 (8 nM) for 5 days. TRAP‐positive multinucleated osteoclasts are indicated by arrows. Scale bar, 20 μm. (G) Quantification of TRAP‐positive multinucleated cells per well. Data are presented as the mean ± SD ( n = 3 independent experiments), and p ‐values were calculated using one‐way analysis of variance (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001). BMP, bone morphogenetic protein; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; ALP, alkaline <t>phosphatase;</t> Col1, collagen type I; Runx2, runt‐related transcription factor 2; OCN, osteocalcin; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde‐3‐phosphate dehydrogenase.
Trap Alp Double Stain Kit, supplied by TaKaRa, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/trap alp double stain kit/product/TaKaRa
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
trap alp double stain kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


SSCs alleviate the radiation-induced bone injury in mice. (A–G) Micro-CT analysis of bone microstructure. (A) Representative micro-CT images of femurs. Quantitative analysis of (B) bone mineral density (BMD), (C) bone volume fraction (BV/TV), (D) trabecular thickness (Tb.Th), (E) trabecular number (Tb.N), (F) connectivity density (Conn.D), and (G) trabecular separation (Tb.Sp) at 2- and 4-weeks post irradiation. (H–K) Histological analysis (Scale bar: 100 μm). (H) H&E staining showing steatosis (arrows) and (I) quantitative analysis of steatotic lesions per field. (J) TRAP staining showing osteoclasts (arrows) and (K) quantitative analysis of osteoclast number per field. (L–O) Immunohistochemical staining of osteogenic markers (Scale bar: 100 μm). (L) Osterix staining and (M) quantitative analysis of Osterix-positive area. (N) β-catenin staining and (O) quantitative analysis of β-catenin-positive area. All experiments were conducted in three groups: Control, irradiation (IR), and IR plus SSC (IR+SSC) at 2- and 4-weeks post-irradiation. All data are presented as mean ± SD, with statistical significance determined by unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test (* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001)

Journal: Dose-Response

Article Title: Skeletal Stem Cells Rescue Radiation-Induced Osteogenic Precursor Cell Dysfunction via the Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling Pathway

doi: 10.1177/15593258261440983

Figure Lengend Snippet: SSCs alleviate the radiation-induced bone injury in mice. (A–G) Micro-CT analysis of bone microstructure. (A) Representative micro-CT images of femurs. Quantitative analysis of (B) bone mineral density (BMD), (C) bone volume fraction (BV/TV), (D) trabecular thickness (Tb.Th), (E) trabecular number (Tb.N), (F) connectivity density (Conn.D), and (G) trabecular separation (Tb.Sp) at 2- and 4-weeks post irradiation. (H–K) Histological analysis (Scale bar: 100 μm). (H) H&E staining showing steatosis (arrows) and (I) quantitative analysis of steatotic lesions per field. (J) TRAP staining showing osteoclasts (arrows) and (K) quantitative analysis of osteoclast number per field. (L–O) Immunohistochemical staining of osteogenic markers (Scale bar: 100 μm). (L) Osterix staining and (M) quantitative analysis of Osterix-positive area. (N) β-catenin staining and (O) quantitative analysis of β-catenin-positive area. All experiments were conducted in three groups: Control, irradiation (IR), and IR plus SSC (IR+SSC) at 2- and 4-weeks post-irradiation. All data are presented as mean ± SD, with statistical significance determined by unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test (* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001)

Article Snippet: Paraffin sections of femurs were dewaxed to water, and TRAP staining was performed using a TRAP staining kit (Servicebio, Wuhan, China, G1050-50T) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Techniques: Micro-CT, Irradiation, Staining, Immunohistochemical staining, Control, Two Tailed Test

Comparative effects of BMP9 and BMP2 on osteogenic differentiation and osteoclastogenesis in vitro. (A) Real‐time PCR analysis of key osteogenic genes (Col1, Runx2, ALP, and OCN) in MC3T3‐E1 cells treated with 8 nM of BMP2 or BMP9 for 3, 5, and 7 days. All gene‐expression levels were normalized to GAPDH. (B) Western blot analysis of osteogenic marker proteins in cell lysates harvested after 7 days of treatment with BMP2 or BMP9. GAPDH was used as the loading control. Densitometric quantification of band intensities (integrated density) normalized to GAPDH is shown below the blots and presented as relative protein expression. (C) Western blot showing dose‐dependent p‐Smad1/5/9 in MC3T3‐E1 cells exposed to varying concentrations of BMP2 or BMP9. Phosphorylation was quantified by densitometry and expressed as fold change vs. control after normalization using [(p‐Smad1/5/9)/(total Smad1/5/9)] and further normalized to GAPDH, as shown in the graph below the blots. Asterisks indicate statistical significance for pairwise comparisons between BMP2 and BMP9 at the same concentration (****, p < 0.0001), unless otherwise indicated. (D) ALP activity and representative images of ALP staining in MC3T3‐E1 cultures after 7 days of induction with BMP2 or BMP9. (E) Alizarin Red S staining illustrating mineralized nodule formation after extended culture with BMP2 or BMP9. (F) Representative TRAP‐stained images of RAW 264.7‐derived osteoclasts following treatment with RANKL (3 nM), BMP2 (8 nM), or BMP9 (8 nM) for 5 days. TRAP‐positive multinucleated osteoclasts are indicated by arrows. Scale bar, 20 μm. (G) Quantification of TRAP‐positive multinucleated cells per well. Data are presented as the mean ± SD ( n = 3 independent experiments), and p ‐values were calculated using one‐way analysis of variance (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001). BMP, bone morphogenetic protein; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; ALP, alkaline phosphatase; Col1, collagen type I; Runx2, runt‐related transcription factor 2; OCN, osteocalcin; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde‐3‐phosphate dehydrogenase.

Journal: Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research

Article Title: Bone Morphogenetic Protein ( BMP ) 9 Outperforms BMP2 in Osteogenesis and Osseointegration: In Vitro and In Vivo

doi: 10.1111/cid.70135

Figure Lengend Snippet: Comparative effects of BMP9 and BMP2 on osteogenic differentiation and osteoclastogenesis in vitro. (A) Real‐time PCR analysis of key osteogenic genes (Col1, Runx2, ALP, and OCN) in MC3T3‐E1 cells treated with 8 nM of BMP2 or BMP9 for 3, 5, and 7 days. All gene‐expression levels were normalized to GAPDH. (B) Western blot analysis of osteogenic marker proteins in cell lysates harvested after 7 days of treatment with BMP2 or BMP9. GAPDH was used as the loading control. Densitometric quantification of band intensities (integrated density) normalized to GAPDH is shown below the blots and presented as relative protein expression. (C) Western blot showing dose‐dependent p‐Smad1/5/9 in MC3T3‐E1 cells exposed to varying concentrations of BMP2 or BMP9. Phosphorylation was quantified by densitometry and expressed as fold change vs. control after normalization using [(p‐Smad1/5/9)/(total Smad1/5/9)] and further normalized to GAPDH, as shown in the graph below the blots. Asterisks indicate statistical significance for pairwise comparisons between BMP2 and BMP9 at the same concentration (****, p < 0.0001), unless otherwise indicated. (D) ALP activity and representative images of ALP staining in MC3T3‐E1 cultures after 7 days of induction with BMP2 or BMP9. (E) Alizarin Red S staining illustrating mineralized nodule formation after extended culture with BMP2 or BMP9. (F) Representative TRAP‐stained images of RAW 264.7‐derived osteoclasts following treatment with RANKL (3 nM), BMP2 (8 nM), or BMP9 (8 nM) for 5 days. TRAP‐positive multinucleated osteoclasts are indicated by arrows. Scale bar, 20 μm. (G) Quantification of TRAP‐positive multinucleated cells per well. Data are presented as the mean ± SD ( n = 3 independent experiments), and p ‐values were calculated using one‐way analysis of variance (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001). BMP, bone morphogenetic protein; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; ALP, alkaline phosphatase; Col1, collagen type I; Runx2, runt‐related transcription factor 2; OCN, osteocalcin; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde‐3‐phosphate dehydrogenase.

Article Snippet: Recombinant human RANKL (11682‐HNCH; Sino Biological, Beijing, China) and a tartrate‐resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) staining kit (MK300; Takara Bio, Shiga, Japan) were used for the osteoclast differentiation assay.

Techniques: In Vitro, Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction, Gene Expression, Western Blot, Marker, Control, Expressing, Phospho-proteomics, Concentration Assay, Activity Assay, Staining, Derivative Assay, Polymerase Chain Reaction